Abstract
Sponsors of many U.S. pension and retiree welfare plans should consider reviewing their mortality assumptions to inform decisions, improve reporting, and minimize certain plan costs. This article explores these objectives, outlines how to execute plan-specific analysis, and calls upon plan sponsors to take action.
- © 2017 Pageant Media Ltd
Don’t have access? Register today to begin unrestricted access to our database of research.
Log in using your username and password
In this issue
Jump to section
- Article
- Abstract
- MOTIVATION #1—SUPPORT EFFECTIVE PLAN DESIGN AND RISK MANAGEMENT
- MOTIVATION #2—BETTER UNDERSTAND TRUE PLAN LIABILITIES AND COSTS
- MOTIVATION #3—POTENTIALLY REDUCE CASH REQUIREMENTS AND PBGC PREMIUMS
- WHEN TO CONSIDER FUNDING/PBGC MORTALITY ANALYSIS
- OPTIONS FOR PLAN-SPECIFIC ANALYSIS DEPEND ON PLAN SIZE
- KEY STEPS IN A MORTALITY EXPERIENCE STUDY
- EXAMPLE: RECOGNIZING DEMOGRAPHICS INFLUENCES DECISION MAKING
- ACT NOW
- ENDNOTES
- REFERENCES
- Info & Metrics
- PDF (Subscribers Only)
- PDF (Subscribers Only)
Similar Articles
Cited By...
- No citing articles found.